What is highlighted as problematic concerning the perception of future propositions?

The perception of future propositions being problematic primarily relates to how they can complicate our understanding of past truths. When we make claims about the future, those claims often depend on present knowledge, assumptions, or interpretations that might change over time. If our understanding of the future is rooted in uncertain conditions or fluctuating perspectives, it can obscure how we reflect on or assert past truths. The interaction between our present beliefs about the future and our historical understanding can create cognitive dissonance and ambiguity, making assertions about past events less clear or more challenging to pin down conclusively.

This perspective emphasizes that future propositions are not just about predicting what might happen; they also intertwine with our past interpretations and the way we articulate them. Therefore, when we wrestle with future possibilities, our understanding of previous facts may become clouded, illustrating the complexity of temporal assertions and their implications on knowledge and belief.